By ©Muhammad Haque
1450 Hrs GMT
london Saturday 21 July 2007
UK Crossrail hole plot Minister Ruth Kelly must read this very carefully and think truthfully before listening to UK Big Business
In the past four days, the parade of Crossrail hole peddling lunatics operating in tandem with the ‘Undone’ mayor Ken Lyingstill Livingstone and the City of london interests, have started to bray for CrossRail.
Their latest braying is just as irrational as had been every singe one of the previous ones.
But just because they are irrational does not guarantee that the ‘Secretary of State’ Ruth Kelly will see through that. Or that she will want to see through that.
Like Douglas Alexander before her [in the same post], Ruth Kelly is seriously democracy-deficient and intellectually and ethically immature. She,. Ike Alexander, is only able to 'command' attention because she has BEEN PUT IN A post that is given recognition by the UK state. Sands by extension of that arrangement of society and the exercise of control in it, by the public and by the media.
For the benefit of Ruth Kelly, we are publishing this updated version of the purse and the aim of the Khoodeelaar! Movement against the CrossRail hole attacks on the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area
This will be continued during the weakened [Saturday 21 – Sunday 22 July 2007]
What does KHOODEELAAR! mean?
[This is part of a wider set of doemnatry and pub shed erxpanations, trasnations and meanings]
www.khoodeelaar.com
[=]
www.khoodeelaar.com
Editor© Muhammad Haque
This updated definition, description and contextual explanation of KHOODEELAAR! was written [on 12 May 2006] by Muhammad Haque and updated at 1320 – 1430 Hrs GMT on Saturday 21 July 2007
Khoodeelaar! is the most recognised [Seelotee language] word in the campaigning language coming out of the East End of London.
The word KHOODEELAAR! is now recognised and appreciated farther afield and is being applied to convey the wider implications that the word was originally devised to convey as a norm after the initial periods.
There is no one-word translation of Khoodeelaar! available in the English language.
Here then is the explanation and interpretation of Khoodeelaar! from the author of the word in context:
At least three words are absolutely needed to convey the basic meaning.
Eg: They are digging, it is digging or [Unrecognisable, hostile invasive force] is digging! Khoodeelaar! Is spelt like this to minimise the phonetic distortion of the seelotee sound which would result if the word were spelt with the single u, the single I and the single a [‘khudilar’].
Khoodeelaar! means they are digging; the hostile forces are digging; the outsiders are digging; the wrongdoers are digging! They are digging in our area; they are digging to disrupt us, dislocate us and to deprive us… Khoodeelaar! is the campaign rallying cry to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area against the Crossrail hole assault Bill. The word Khoodeelaar has many other permutations that constitute a robust linguistic and social statement of solidarity against the invading plotters of Big business identifying with the City of London and their hidden promoters and touts now installed on the 'democratic institution' of the East End local Council, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Khoodeelaar! is aimed at defusing the corruptly and crassly conceived CrossRail hole Bill.
That is the only way to stop the attackers in their tracks! part of the task has been achieved by the Khoodeelaar! campaign which forced the then UK Crossrail hole Bill Minister Alistair Darling [22-24 March 2006] to concede [in Written statement to the UK House of Commons on 30 March 2006] the first Brick Lane Dirt Hole plan to be totally illogical, irrational, unnecessary.
Darling was forced by the Khoodeelaar! movement against CRASSrail hole plot, to make the concession and to beat that particular retreat.
This correlationship was evident in the fact of Darling’s behaviour immediately after the Khoodeelaar! movement announced [Wednesday 22 March 2006] the then finalised series of [impending] high court actions against him and against his subsidiary agents and colluders on the CrossRail hole Bill.
The Blairing entourage that got scrambled together in March 2006 in a hurry to avoid a constitutional law disaster at the hands of the Khoodeelaar! movement and the attendant adverse publicity running for months and more, included a contingent from the ‘local’ Council in the area targeted for the Crossrail assault on the community, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council. They made a specially corruptly enhanced appearance aided and abetted by the lying controllers of the BBC and ITV who created the visual [and the allied and consequential subliminal impact and] impression for a few seconds that it was the ‘local Tower Hamlets’ Council that was in fact doing the running on Crossrail.
They were indeed doing the running. But the running that they were doing was not as the setters of the political agenda around the Crossrail hole attacks on the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area, but as generally very insignificant and very discredited ‘locally linked’ and the ‘local’ Council-linked elements that were running around to save their pathetically pursued careers as ‘local councillors’ and their equally corrupt enterprises that they had conjured up via their surrogate relationship with the core Blairing elements that controlled the Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council.
They were on notice [at least since 22 September 2005] from Khoodeelaar! that they would not be allowed to remain on the Tower Hamlets Council by the local community if they continued to fail to stop their [‘Tower Hamlets Council’s] Crossrail hole collusions.
In March 2006, when the then programme of legal actions by Khoodeelaar! to stop the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End was being progressed, the atmosphere was specially charged al across Tower Hamlets as based on the facts of the Khoodeelaar! campaign as well as by the actual evidence of the Council's corruption which Khoodeelaar! was bringing out and to the attention f the community and the wider public.
This phenomenal politicisation of the atmosphere within less than two months of the then scheduled local council elections [4 May 2006] could result in serious losses of credibility by the key elements that controlled the corrupt Council and the elements that kept the corrupt council corrupt.
As was confirmed on 4 May 2006, the voters did pay attention to the Khoodeelaar! Campaign and they refused to vote for some of the most persistent peddlers and liars for the Crossrail hoe pot on the community.
The promise that the Khoodeelaar! Movement had pronounced on Thursday 22 Sweeter 2005 was kept and vindicated.
The constitutional law options for challenging the unconstitutionality of the Crossrail hole Bill in a competent and unbiased UK court are very limited indeed. Historically, UK courts [=the ‘judges’ and the accompanying bureaucracies involved in the operation of the courts in the UK] have behaved mostly as extensions of the UK executive, that is, of the UK Government.
So the chance of a UK court actually agreeing with the community as represented by Khoodeelaar! in showing that the UK Government has been wrong to promote the Crossrail hole, is not very high.
The UK court system is very corrupt.
The Uk legal system is very corrupt.
There is no culture of constitutionality in the actual practise of the law in the UK.
So the legal and the constitutional law aspects of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign have had to be geared to a legal system that is itself in need of being updated.
This has given rise to so many additional and creative constitutional law devices that are being originated by the Khoodeelaar! Movement.
This is going to be tested first in the london High Court in the next few weeks or months. Then we are panning a programme of actions that will test the relevance of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords [the Judicial Committee].
After that we are panning to test the usefulness of the European court system.
[To be continued]
